To be fair, did we really expect the NHL, of all leagues, to have a firm grasp on the meaning of the term "diversity"? By inflating the numbers instead of actually altering the percentages in any sort of equitable way, they basically acted as inclusive as a preppy fraternity that doubled the size of its average pledge class to feel better about the addition of black twins, but at least the wool they are pulling over our eyes this time around doesn't have a massive hole in it. As much of a farce as it is for them to claim diversification when five extremely predictable teams account for 37% of the schedule, this is a hell of a lot more respectable attempt at tricking the viewing public than dedicating a night of the week to the full-on fabrication of non-existent rivalries. I still see through their bullshit, but at least this time around I had to get a little closer and take a unpleasant whiff to tell that's exactly what it is. This schedule is insanely top heavy with match-ups we've seen 300 times over featuring teams like the Blackhawks and Rangers whose pathetic performance last year isn't reflected in their national appearances next year. However, the NHL apparently does now care enough to try to shield our eyes before giving a public tug job to traditional markets. They are basically doing the equivalent of giving pity dates to ethic-looking women to prove there's no prejudice, but actually appearing self-aware to their stubborn reputation in making it seem like showcasing the entirety of their talent is their first priority is a step in the right direction...albeit a small one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Archives
January 2020
|