Vibe- “Not to be sexist but, I can’t vote for the leader of the free world to be a woman,” he said. “Just because, every other position that exists, I think a woman could do well. But the president? It’s kinda like, I just know that women make rash decisions emotionally – they make very permanent, cemented decisions – and then later, it’s kind of like it didn’t happen, or they didn’t mean for it to happen. And I sure would hate to just set off a nuke. [Other leaders] will not be able to negotiate the right kinds of foreign policy; the world ain’t ready yet. I think you might be able to the Loch Ness Monster elected before you could [get a woman].”
I like my beat down low, I like my top let back, the only "first" I want in office is someone who is male and black! T.I. ladies and gentleman! just sitting down at radio stations and dropping completely antiquated lines of thinking. Completely antiquated lines of thinking that every man man, self aware woman, and child has taken into consideration as well. Listen, it's 2015. You can't say that a woman is incapable of doing something solely because she is a woman. That's sexist. Granted, I think it's more sexist to vote for a woman that's only a candidate because of the MAN she married, but that's neither here nor there.
Is it really that bad to say that men are typically better at some things and women are typically better at others? Men are better at making decisions, and women are better at being compassionate and understanding. There may be exceptions, but those things are generally pretty true. Men are cold hearted assholes that can take emotion out of equation, and women are warm, sensitive creatures that let stupid feelings get in the way. It's a fact that foreign policy is a lot more concrete and stable than the state of most female relationships. Consider this. You know all those high school-esque on again, off again relationships? Who is responsible for the breakup 90% of the time in those situations. It's the woman, and unfortunately for them, you can't make international enemies one day, and reconcile with a text message the next. That's not how this whole "leader of the free world" thing works. That doesn't mean I am going to go protest against Hillary's right to run for office or anything, but if you take that part about the Loch Ness monster out, I think it's fair to say that I share the same concerns as T.I. If I can't expect a woman to make the final decision on where to eat when she's hungry, on how I can trust her with safety of our country when she's stressed?